FREE THEATRE CHRISTCHURCH
  • ABOUT
    • What is Free Theatre?
    • A brief history...
    • Peter Falkenberg
    • Ensemble
    • Jarry, Ubu, Pataphysics and Free Theatres
    • Training and Devising
    • Designers and Space
    • Manifesto
    • Te Puna Toi
    • Writing
    • Theses by Free Theatre
    • Praise for Free Theatre Christchurch
    • Awards and Nominations
  • UPCOMING
    • In-Development
    • Ubu Nights
    • Ars Acustica
    • How not to be Hamlet?
    • Prophet
    • Te Puna Toi: A Midsummer's Night Dream
    • Frankenstein
  • ARCHIVE
    • 1979--present
    • About the Archive
    • The Black Rider
    • Frankenstein
    • The Mauricio Kagel Project
    • Te Puna Toi 2015: Footprints/Tapuwae
    • Kafka's Amerika
    • Canterbury Tales
    • I Sing the Body Electric
    • Hereafter
    • The Earthquake in Chile
    • Gallery
    • TV3 Clips
    • Newsletters
  • SUPPORT
  • EDUCATION
  • GYM
  • BLOG

Anniversary... 3 years in The Gym...

8/31/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Tonight, on the first day of spring and the last night of The Black Rider, we have something to celebrate: Free Theatre's birthday in The Gym. On 1 September 2014 we officially began working in The Gym towards our very first Ubu Night on 5 September. Our tenure in The Gym was only to be two years, with the original plan for the space to be a restaurant and for Free Theatre to take up other residence in the Arts Centre. With original collaborators Arts Circus, we pitched the idea of a flexible contemporary performance space to the Arts Centre and set about implementing a light-touch fit-out with support from Christchurch City Council, Rata Foundation and Creative New Zealand. While the support for the fit-out was relatively modest, Stuart Lloyd-Harris designed and implemented an exemplary 'black box' that has allowed for a diversity of events to take place in the Arts Centre, from Free Theatre's central New Works and Education Programme that is designed specifically to exploit and showcase what is possible in this beautiful space, to festivals such as the Christchurch Arts Festival and the Jazz and Blues Festival, as well as a diversity of arts, community, corporate and private events. It is inevitable (especially with limited funding) that there are limitations to the space. However, this also leads to innovative ways of developing new work and unusual experiences for audiences. Over the three years we've been operating, local, national and international artists who don't necessarily know our situation, rave about The Gym, it's ambience and acoustics, it's sense of place in a city struggling to remember, and its inspiration for work of the future. We are proud of what has been achieved and even more so about what is on the cards in the next few years given the collaborations we have initiated thus far.

It can be frustrating as we struggle to survive to hear the constant wrangling over big building projects like the proposed performing arts precinct ($45 mil for the Court; $18mil for a 'black box') and other spaces emerging that we are being asked to contribute to as presenters even though we have stated our preferred situation - an inspiring space to develop and present new work. It is not that we wouldn't present elsewhere - obviously this is something we have done a lot over the years - but often the planners and funders look at it from the conventional venue manager's point of view that assumes pre-existing work based around conventional commercial returns. Consider, for example, the vitally important Christchurch Arts Festival, which currently directs its funding towards importing work from elsewhere with little to no support towards fostering local artists - this is a model that desperately needs to change, if we're serious about developing an exciting, engaging city that encourages talent to stay and contribute, and attracts high quality contemporary artists to come here and work with us. Festival directors need to foster artists to take risks towards distinctive new work. Currently, they shape and direct what work is produced with exponentially shrinking ideas of what they think will please their established audience - this breeds mediocrity, at best. As this established audience gets tired of the same old festival fare, visionary new ideas are required to nurture new work that energises established audiences and builds new ones. There are ample examples of great festivals already doing this and others that have transitioned in response to social, economic, political and environmental change. They build their foundations around local artists as well as curating international artists to collaborate with locals.

Despite the frustration and fatigue that sets in as we fight endlessly for an artist-led space that has more than proven its value despite chronic underfunding and attempts to dismiss it on the way to big, new shiny venues of yesteryear, we are extremely grateful and inspired by the support we have received. There is the support already mentioned from CCC, CNZ and the ever-consistent Rata Foundation, as well as champions that got us started and have kept us going, including ZNO (Jason Mill), Duncan Cotterill (Paul Calder), Kendons (Lance Edmonds and Kate Bennett) and Steel and Tube. We've developed wonderful friendships with Cassels and Sons and Black Estate Wines and we're pleased to be in a neighbourhood with businesses that include Zen Sushi, The Curator's Deli, Bunsen and our earliest, dearest pioneer friends at Canterbury Cheesemongers and Cookin with Gas/Astro Lounge. There are many others that have supported particular projects (for example Phantom have been incredible with The Black Rider), and of course, there are the audiences, old and new, that come to experience the work, expecting to be challenged with something different, and take the time to let us know that this is valued - this kind of support is valued beyond measure. 

Most of all, we're driven by the artists that come to work with Free Theatre and an Arts Centre management that supports this work to continue. Christchurch is blessed with remarkable artists across a range of disciplines that continue to produce work that fuels a distinctive New Zealand culture. These are people driven not by money nor fame (if they are, then FT is a terrible choice) but the need to create work that speaks to the time and place - a desire to engage with the community we live in out of a dissatisfaction with the world as it is. Our aim is to keep providing outlets for this dissatisfaction to be expressed in conversation with the community towards hope and change. We know this desire is shared by the Arts Centre who signalled bold aims when they signed us up as the first arts-practice tenancy in 2014 and have continued to make it possible for us to work in this important, vital site that straddles the city's past and future. To everyone at the Arts Centre, and especially the inspirational André Lovatt: we continue to build programmes, collaborations and networks towards new work that supports your aims for the Arts Centre to be a special place for the city. With your support, friendship and partnership, we look forward to the future. 

Early days and the first Ubu Night

0 Comments

Interview with Delaney Davidson on playing the devil....

8/28/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
-Why were you interested in the The Black Rider project?
Have loved the music by Tom for ages, I listened to it years ago, and was always interested in the Faust theme. I also wanted to get away from the rigid way music is performed on stage, and try something more dramatic. The fact that it was a Christchurch based project was a massive appeal as most of my work takes me travelling.
 
-Did you have any prior interest in Waits, Burroughs or Wilson’s work?
Huge fan of Waits over the years, and enjoyed the influence that Burroughs had on writing as well as his seminal work teaching the Beat poets.
 
-What was your role and how did you approach it?
Pegleg the Devil/Ringmaster and also a small role as a haunted painting. I thought a lot about it on my own and also enjoyed following the direction of Peter Falkenberg. It was really great to work with a director. I enjoyed having a different outlook on my performance and it was invaluable to have direction that I believed in. I found it would give me the conviction I needed as it wasn’t my decision whether It was working or not, I could just trust Peter.   
 
-Did you introduce anything new to your role or make any obvious changes from the actor who played it in the original Hamburg production? 
I tried to use the character of William Burroughs as a cue for the way my version of Pegleg spoke; a strange lilting staggering flowing way of talking. I also went against my initial impulse to make him angry mean and loud and tried to play him as quietly as possible. I though this made him more sinister. I watched the Hamburg version to get some solutions aswell to the way he is in certain scenes.
 
-What was it like working with Laban movement techniques?
Using Laban was a challenge but also really good as it helped me get out of my usual traps. It’s a great exercise and really starts you thinking differently about movement.
 
-What instruments did you play?
Guitar, Singing, Drums, Whistling, Singing Saw, and Banjo.
 
-Describe your costume decisions?
A tail coat for some elegance and formal feeling, a corset to make him unnaturally skinny, boots and tight trousers to make his legs and feet look like hooves and animals legs, gloves to make the hands iconic/symbolic, a hat, and make up to give him a birdlike quality.
 
-What was the process creating this different version of the original musical score?
We started out just trying what would work with the scenes, and because we were using a lot less musicians we had to make sacrifices. We lost our drummer as well so this meant everyone had a lot to do. I think all these setbacks were in our favour in the end.
 
-How would you describe the music in the production?
Atmospheric, Beautiful, Sad, Dark, Minimal, Tense, Loud, Disgusting, Sweet, Horrible, Frightening, Heartbreaking, Rousing, Compelling, Simple and Complex.
 
-How was your experience working as an actor/musician in the theatre different to your previous experiences? 
I love theatre music because it can be so minimal and do so much. Its very different from performing a show. I sometimes miss the possibility of volume that I have at a live concert. But I always enjoy the way theatre music makes me think about sound very differently.
 
-What was your experience collaborating with others on the project and what were the difficulties and challenges?
Working in a group is a real challenge for me. I am naturally impatient, and find the slowness makes me freak out. I also find it challenging to be dependent on other peoples timetables. I enjoyed what happens with a group when it comes to creative input and found we made something as a group that I could never have found on my own. Working with others, overcoming my inhibitions with movement and performing, learning text, doing things the same every time, keeping the focus and intensity of the character for the length of the show.
 
Thursday 31st August - Friday 1st September, 8pm.
https://nz.patronbase.com/_FreeTheatre/Productions/1516/Performances

0 Comments

Flashback #9... returning to Heiner Mueller, MEDEAMATERIAL in 1995

8/11/2017

0 Comments

 
It is not often that I am stuck for words. But in describing MedeaMaterial I cannot find language adequate to the experience. It bears as much relationship to what passes for theatre here as chess does to snakes and ladders.
Imogen de la Bere, The Press

A follow-up to the artistic and popular success of HamletMachine in 1991, Free Theatre returned to Heiner Mueller with the development and presentation of a new interpretation of the modern masters work in 1995, MedeaMaterial. The Free Theatre was gutted and transformed into a nightclub complete with a bar in the playing area and television screens and peep holes all around the space. The entire theatre was used for the action - backstage, understage, toilet, workshop, store room - with the actors taking up different interpretations of Mueller's collage of texts (fragments of everyday conversations he recorded) inspired by the Medea and Jason story. Following an overtly ritualistic opening through and around the audience, the action moved to different parts of the theatre. Audiences had to move, drink in hand, to see the diverse Jasons and Medeas taking up different perspectives on the story inspired by the distinct spaces of the theatre - peeping and eavesdropping on couples squabbling as if in a nightclub. The performance document above was produced by cast member Olivia Lory-Kay.

Falkenberg has, once again, set a standard of brilliant imaginative theatre which others can only dream of attaining. But if only they would just dream of it. 
Imogen de la Bere, The Press

The extraordinary design - set, light and sound - grew out of a collaboration between Falkenberg and Lawrence Wallen. Mark McEntyre, a performer in HamletMachine, also returned to team up with Wallen on the design for the space. This production marked the transition of the Drama Programme at the University into fully fledged Theatre and Film Department with the Stage Three class providing the majority of actors for this Free Theatre production. The ensemble approach was noted by reviewers, the actors exhibiting the physical training and integration of theory and practice discovered through Falkenberg's cornerstone TAFS 301 course, which explored Modern Theatre via experiments with the work of Stanislavski, Meyerhold, Brecht, Artaud, Grotowski, Boal and theoretical touchstones provided by Erving Goffmann and Paulo Friere. The core of the MedeaMaterial cast would go onto be the first postgraduate class for the new Theatre and Film Studies Department, the first dedicated programme of its kind in the country. This would begin, following MedeaMaterial, with the development of research around collaborative work on a core text, starting with Robinson Crusoe.

​The success of MedeaMaterial saw Free Theatre touring to Wellington for the first time in 1996. 
​I remember feeling quite vulnerable and exposed – confronted. As I moved around with the other spectators I suddenly became conscious of the fact that I was part of the performance. I felt strangely isolated and at the same time connected to others who seemed to be experiencing something similar. I recall the lively conversations that followed the performance, conversations I had never had in my previous theatre-going experiences. I felt part of a community. 
George Parker, audience member

Picture

The Free Theatre acted, and probably still does, as a laboratory for some of the most creative minds in New Zealand with artistic consequences far beyond the theatre and time of production. The Free Theatre has continued to engage in a dialogue, at an international level, between space, narrative and body that has allowed local students to overcome traditional barriers of intellectual isolation preparing graduates for careers both in New Zealand and on the world stage. This has been made possible by the sacrifice and commitment of its founders and supporters who over the last 25 years have not only delivered an excellent contemporary theatre to Christchurch but have influenced more than one generation of New Zealand artists, filmmakers and thinkers.
- Lawrence Wallen, Designer, MedeaMaterial; Head of School, School of Design, University of Technology Sydney
Picture
0 Comments

Flashback #8... Oscar Wilde's SALOME

8/11/2017

0 Comments

 
In 1994, Falkenberg continued his fruitful collaboration with visual artist Graham Bennett to develop a new interpretation of Oscar Wilde's Salome. The production was praised for its nuanced performances, beautifully playing in and around the striking design, a series of turning iron glass/mirror structures on stage.

Neither at things, nor at people should one look. Only in mirrors should one look, for mirrors do but show us masks.
King Herod in Oscar Wilde's Salome 

The production again involved students from the now firmly established and successful Drama Programme along with Free Theatre stalwarts such as Robin Bond as King Herod. While Free Theatre continued as an independent entity, a professional theatre producing high quality experimental work, its collaboration with the University meant that students were able to work in an environment that allowed them to grow as artists through experimentation and a rare combination (in New Zealand) of theory and practice. This paved the way for the emergence of a new dedicated department at the University, growing out of the extraordinary work of Free Theatre artists over the previous decade. 
Picture
Robin Bond and Peter Falkenberg back stage at the original Free Theatre in the Christchurch Arts Centre.
0 Comments

Flashback #7... in 1991, Free Theatre Christchurch connects with Free Theatre Munich to present Heiner Mueller's HAMLETMACHINE

7/28/2017

0 Comments

 
... simply the most exciting theatre piece Christchurch has experienced in years... HAMLETMACHINE's opening night full house proves that Christchurch audiences do support serious theatre
Lex Matheson, Reviewer, The Press
Picture
If the 1980s had been about establishing a youthful, energetic presence in Christchurch, the 1990s saw exciting developments in Free Theatre's aims and growing influence. This included engaging with international contemporary performance artists and the founding of a dedicated Theatre and Film Studies Department (est. 1997) that unfettered the theory and practice of theatre and film from the traditional, marginalised existence in the literary dominated realm of English Departments. Canterbury University was the first in the country to do so and its Theatre and Film Studies Department quickly became successful with a rapidly growing postgraduate culture. This ultimately culminated in the emergence of the groundbreaking Te Puna Toi Performance Research Project in 2001.

While the company had engaged with past and current avant garde in the 1980s, it was perhaps a collaboration with Free Theatre Munich (est. 1970) in 1991 that really established the company as a noted presence in the international contemporary theatre scene. Falkenberg initiated the collaboration with this theatre company from his home town, inviting directors George Froscher and Kurt Bildstein to come to Christchurch to present a reimagined production of a Heiner Mueller work, HamletMachine. They had presented the work previously in Germany and the US. Mueller's work, considered the most important in Germany since Brecht, had never been staged in New Zealand, let alone Christchurch, and this offered the opportunity for local artists and the students of the growing Theatre Programme at Canterbury University to have access to international contemporary theatre through the making of it with established international theatre artists. On the strength of the international exchange, Free Theatre Christchurch secured an Arts Grant from the QE II Arts Council of New Zealand (later CreativeNZ). Remarkably, the company would not receive another CNZ grant until 2012 despite many years of trying with an extraordinary array of high profile, high quality work with a diversity of collaborators. 

HamletMachine is typical of Mueller's work in that it is based around a collaging of texts and monologue's, rather than conventional narrative or plot. In this instance, the work is concerned with what it means to be an actor - a concern that Falkenberg would return to in different social, historical contexts, including current project How Not To Be Hamlet? A combination of professional actors and students worked on the HamletMachine production, which took place around the Arts Centre, in Rutherford's Den and the Great Hall. It was a hugely successful production both in popular and critical reviews and paved the way for a series of dynamic projects through the 1990s. 

Below are some stills from a Nightline (TV3) piece on the production. The full clip itself can be found on the HamletMachine page.

Picture
0 Comments

The Gym in 1908

7/28/2017

0 Comments

 
A big thank you to Charlie Gates for sending this beautiful image of The Gym the year it was built. Originally the gymnasium for Christchurch Boy's High School (which occupied the buildings next door), it eventually became the home of Academy Cinema in 1976 when the university gifted the wider site to the city when it relocated to Ilam. The Academy occupied the building until the earthquakes of 2011 closed the entire site. As part of the restoration of the Arts Centre, the building was stripped back to its original form and strengthened. Free Theatre has occupied the building since September 2014.
Picture
Interior of Gymnasium, Christchurch Boys High School, Christchurch. Webb, Steffano, 1880-1967 : Collection of negatives. Ref: 1/1-004026-G. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/23100780
0 Comments

Flashback #6... Fassbinder's The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant

7/23/2017

0 Comments

 
Free Theatre's production of Rainer Werner Fassbinder's The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant in 1988 marked a turning point for the company. The scrapping of the PEP (Project Employment Programme) by the Labour Government in its second term meant it was not possible to maintain a regular working group in the same way. At the same time, the relationship with the university had grown stronger with student interest in the INCO drama course growing to the point that a dedicated theatre programme was inevitable. With this in mind, the university had begun paying the lease for the theatre in the Arts Centre that the original members had built. University classes were taught in the theatre (renamed University Theatre) and it was via the Free Theatre that the university re-engaged with the site it had gifted to the city two decades earlier when the campus was moved to Ilam. The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant, in some ways, represented a transition with members of the group working with students from the university and collaborating with design students at the Christchurch Polytechnic. 

Before his career took off in film, Fassbinder had worked in experimental theatre. The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant represented a crossover as it was first produced in the theatre (1971) before being turned into a film (1972) with his regular collaborators Margit Carstensen, Hanna Schygulla and Irm Hermann. The film retains an intense theatricality and reflects the influence of Douglas Sirk melodramas on Fassbinder; grand, sweeping portrayals of everyday lives and relationships that in their excess reveal the machinations of the wider society on the individual - an hysterical scream of the repressed, reflecting internal conflict silenced by societal forces of conformity. In The Melodramatic Imagination, Peter Brooks described melodrama as the "text of muteness": "We may legitimately claim that melodrama becomes the principle mode for uncovering, demonstrating and making operative the essential moral universe in a  post-sacred-era". The sado-masochistic role-plays between three female protagonists was where Falkenberg began work with the actors to recontextualise Fassbinder's work for New Zealand in the late 1980s. 

Free Theatre's production subtly questioned the society of the time, epitomised perhaps by the popularity of TV series Gloss, considered "a coming of age" in New Zealand television. Gloss' representation of excess and 'yuppie' culture was seen as symptomatic of the 1980s. The introduction of 'free market' values had a profound, insidious effect on even the most personal aspects of the individual's life and relationships not to mention outlook on the world and 'reality'. Reality was shaped by the new, neoliberal economic perspectives. The Christchurch production saw Julia Allen in the title role of fashion designer Petra, following on from her collaboration with Falkenberg on Lulu. The production was notable for exploring these concerns via an innovative collaboration with designers with the designer clothes worn by the all-female cast and the designer furniture they sat on and moved around, all available for purchase. Prices were included in the programme - everything was for sale. The performance also began with a pre-show fashion parade with professional models, which in the context of the performance signalled a consideration of New Zealand's turn to 'free market' polices where every thing and everyone is for sale. Following Fassbinder's film, the Christchurch production also incorporated a musical backbone (always a strong feature of Falkenberg's work) that included Verdi and The Platters, heightening the sense of melodramatic excess alongside the excess of fashion that so typified the dramatic change in New Zealand society on the 1980s.

As Free Theatre continues to develop a key project, How Not To Be Hamlet?, which explores the effects of the 1984 social and economic reforms on New Zealand society, it is instructive to consider this formative Free Theatre production. As with so much of Falkenberg's work, like Fassbinder, there is a prescience and unflinching gaze at contemporary political life via the personal experience of the collaborators. Perhaps even more so than Fassbinder, who famously replicated his personal life on stage and screen (Bitter Tears a prime example), Falkenberg is closer to Brecht in finding through a conversation with his collaborators a political perspective that does not rely so heavily on his personal perspective. This is not to say Falkenberg is without a personal view but it is his ability to inspire questioning in the collaborators that allows the work to come into being, making it relevant and important to everyone involved in producing the work. This is evident in his theatre work and his foray into film with Remake in 2007. 

In a culture famously reticent when the subject of politics is raised, Free Theatre's approach to theatre elevates the experience to be a relevant gauge of the time and place. The company finds ways of provoking discussion that may not always be popular but that are nevertheless appreciated as essential by those that view art as a means of resisting the conformity of the status quo by making visible ideological perspectives that are hidden as seeming natural or inevitable. 
Picture
Picture
Picture

Any life story that deals with a relationship or whatever is a melodrama and, for this reason, I think melodrama films are correct films. The American method of making them, however, left the audience with emotions and nothing else. I want to give the spectator the emotions along with the possibility of reflecting on and analysing what he is feeling. With Brecht you see the emotions and you reflect upon them as you witness them but you never feel them. That's my interpretation and I think I go farther that he did in that I let the audience feel and think.
Rainer Werner Fassbinder, 1977

It's got a certain transparency about it, because if the clothes weren't so fashionable, so slick, there would be no transparency at all. Often women hide behind a glossy exterior of fashion and there's more to people than this superficiality.
Penny Bainbridge, Producer,
​The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant

0 Comments

Flashback #5... PEP scheme helps sustain contemporary theatre...

7/15/2017

2 Comments

 
The development of a strong ongoing Free Theatre Group in the early 1980s was made possible by the Project Employment Programme (PEP) introduced by the National government of the time. A wider scheme across multiple industries, it also allowed artists to work in the theatre with a view to developing skills that would contribute to ongoing employment.

This allowed for a dedicated ensemble to develop in the new Arts Centre theatre the company had built in 1982. A diversity of works were produced in line with the company's manifesto:
To stage old and new rarely staged European plays in original translations, new New Zealand plays, and classical English texts in an unusual and experimental style. Emphasis is placed on non-verbal action and high production standards, discouraging the star system and encouraging long rehearsal and training periods in a company context.
Picture
Not the worst misspelling over the years.

Productions through the early to mid 1980s ranged from works produced by Peter Falkenberg such as the company's magnificently gruesome King Lear, hauntingly beautiful Leonce and Lena and spectacular Lulu, to stagings of new works written by company members, including Nansi Thompson (Texts For Decomposition) and Stuart McKenzie (The Joffongract, A Letter from L, The Mortal Pleasure of Wanda Lust and The Rapist Over Susannah). Meanwhile, Robin Bond initiated with Electra what would become an ongoing series of productions of classical Greek texts that he translated and directed.

At the same time, a slew of imaginative new works emerged that exposed local audiences to international contemporary theatre through presentations of avant garde innovators from Brecht to Sam Shepard, Patti Smith and Peter Handke... Mahagonny, Cowboy Mouth, (both directed by Falkenberg), Action (dir. Carol Bellini-Sharp), Tongues (assisted by Bellini-Sharp and Falkenberg), The Ride Over Lake Constance (dir. Nick Frost), Red Cross (dir. Leonard Wilcox with Falkenberg) and Takeaway (dir. Falkenberg with Roy Montgomery). Alongside this, an education programme with immersive productions such as The Hunting of the Snark began to attract students. Current Free Theatre ensemble member Emma Johnston cites Free Theatre's Snark production as a most memorable early theatre experience. 

These productions served as the foundations to the emergence of a special new voice of contemporary theatre in New Zealand. The Press Arts Editor Chris Moore, previewing Faust Chroma in 2008 said: "For quarter of a century, Free Theatre has redefined cultural horizons and shaped Christchurch perceptions of contemporary theatre". With daring and determination, Free Theatre established itself in the 1980s as part of a tradition of Christchurch arts organisations and artists in the visual arts, music, literature and film that developed new work that was distinct and influential in the wider cultural landscape of New Zealand. 

We've yet to feature all Free Theatre productions on our website (its a big archive!) but below are a few pics from the productions mentioned some of which feature on the website (links above). You can also see images from productions over three decades in our archive gallery. 

Texts for Decomposition

Picture
Picture
Picture

Leonce and Lena

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Action / Tongues

Picture
Picture
Picture

The Hunting of the Snark

Picture

Cowboy Mouth

Picture
Picture
Picture

Mahagonny

Picture
Picture

Lulu

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
2 Comments

Flashback #4... 1984

7/15/2017

1 Comment

 
Picture
Perhaps one of Free Theatre's best known productions of the eighties was 1984: the future is now. Inspired by Orwell's novel, the production (presented in 1984) became notorious for an interrogation process that audiences had to go through on entering the theatre. Led by chief heavies, Rudi Boelee and Quentin Wilson, the interrogators evicted audiences that did not conform, which led to one disturbed punter lodging an official complaint. Other highlights included an interrogation onstage in which the Ministry of Truth (led by Robin Bond as O'Brien) coerced everyman Smith (Charles Heywood) into conformity by placing a cage with a live rat over his head. 

Free Theatre's 1984 served as a point of comparison for the recent production of Kafka's Amerika - how the mechanisms of 'Big Brother' and state control have become more effective in Western society with a move from the more overt (think the riots of 1981 and the authoritarian imaginings of Smith's Dream/Sleeping Dogs) to the more insidious mechanisms of control, where surveillance both big (Five Eyes) and small (Facebook) dictates our everyday lives.

Directed by Peter Falkenberg, 1984 was the first of a number of productions that visual artist Graham Bennett contributed to as designer (the others included Salome, Mahagonny, and Crusoe). We will be hosting a new installation by Graham Bennett in The Gym in October - a work inspired by Bosch's The Gardens of Earthy Delights and a provocation relating to our use of water. 

Free Theatre's collaborations with visual artists as designers has become a key part of the company's work over three decades.

Picture
Picture
Picture

Every social order creates its own reality which is backed up by propaganda, whether it is subtle or obvious – things like the work ethic, the marriage ethic and the desire for happiness and security. Any individual who stands out against these myths is treated with suspicion or down-right hostility.
Peter Falkenberg on 1984

Picture
Picture
1 Comment

Free Theatre flashback #3... Ubu

7/4/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
​We'll never be able to explain Ubu. Ubu will not be defined... nor confined... what does it mean to release yourself... leaning to one side... and to be free?

Merdre.

In 1982, Free Theatre Chch presented Ubu Roi. Directed by Peter Falkenberg, and designed by Simon Allison, Neil Williams and Bernie Frankpitt the cast featured Craig Hood, Jo Briant, Nick Frost, Robin Bond, Helene Glover, Ruth Jones, Adam Phillpps, Charles Heywood, Rod Dundar and Mark di Somma.

When the name Free Theatre was chosen for the company (after a couple of other options didn't stick) a tradition was acknowledged and a political manifesto proposed relative to here. There was much discussion. The hope was New Zealanders (and those in Chch especially) would respond to a philosophy of pushing boundaries to innovate and experiment. The suspicion was that an old provincial stupor combined with a growing stupefying economic perspective would drown out the hope of change - "hey, you say it's free, so why do I have to pay? That's false advertising mate". 

And sure enough, that one has been fired at FT for years, as the market has become entrenched in our everyday lives.  

When we say the word 'free' (compared, say, to libre or freie), what springs to people's minds? To be released from expectation, custom, oppression, slavery in search of new hope and possibilities - innovation? Or stuff you don't have to pay for, a bargain, a waiving of cost, the logic of a market where exchange is predicated on growth - 'cos there ain't no such thing as a free lunch - mate? 

Freedom, here, is about money... it's about gain.

Yet, every time we question whether we should change our name, when the usual brand-oriented thinking of supporters and critics alike suggests we're shooting ourselves in the foot, we come repeatedly to the conclusion that it is the economic perspective that needs to change not us - and we must continue to work towards this by pointing out its many contradictions and inequities. 

For some, this is considered pigheaded and even arrogant. But the truth is that without resisting the supposedly inevitable fate of the market, we have no hope.

Without hope we end up trumped by fear.

​Since 2014, Ubu has held court in The Gym... searching for, and hopefully inspiring, hope.

A new production of Ubu Roi is in development for 2017/18...

Picture
Picture
Craig Hood and Jo Briant in Free Theatre's King Ubu, 1982
Picture
Picture
Picture
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    Producer of exciting new contemporary theatre​ - this is our scrapbook...

    Archives

    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Picture
Picture
✕